Samantha Duncan on the Books and Papers that Influenced her Thinking on Insurance

FAI asked Samantha Duncan to tell us about the research papers and books that have influenced how she thinks about insurance. This is what she told us:

My thinking on insurance has evolved and been influenced by personal experiences, but also some books and papers. I am a practitioner at heart, and my earliest thinking came from spending time inside the homes of poor people across Latin America and Asia; getting to know them, their families, and how they live their lives. However, there have also been a number of research papers and books that have had a tremendous impact on my thinking and work. I’ve outlined some of the ideas that have deeply resonated with me below.

Insight 1: The risks poor people face are debilitating. There is a cycle of poverty . . . 

Read More

Knowing is Half the Battle: Unpacking Financial Literacy

The opening of the new Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplaces presents millions of Americans with a complicated financial decision. How do they value insurance? The marketplaces will primarily serve people who are not employed full time or are in low-wage jobs—and are therefore likely to be juggling tight finances already. What is the cost of paying down debt more slowly to buy insurance? The obvious intervention to help people make better financial decisions when faced with complex options is financial literacy.

Unfortunately, the evidence on financial literacy is pretty dismal. David McKenzie’s study of a voluntary financial literacy program in Mexico that finds no effect is pretty representative. Earlier this year, author Helaine Olen wrote that financial literacy is “a bunch of hooey,” Jason Zweig at The Wall Street Journal cited educational programs that actually make people worse off financially, and FINRA released a study showing that financial literacy among Americans has weakened since 2009.

While financial literacy levels are linked to better financial decisions, study after study shows that financial literacy courses are ineffective . . . 

Read More

A Milestone in the Great Debate over a Microcredit Impact Study

This summer the Journal of Development Studies accepted a manuscript by Jonathan Morduch and myself laying out our critique of an influential microcredit study from the 1990s by Mark Pitt of Brown University and Shahidur Khandker of the World Bank. Our article should appear in the journal this year or next. The acceptance is milestone for Jonathan and me, for it represents a ratification of our work, and is very long in coming.

It was 15 years ago that Jonathan first laid out his doubts about Pitt and Khandker (P&K). Pitt retorted the next year. And there the dispute rested, never adjudicated by journals, until I entered the picture 6 years ago by writing a program that, for the first time, allowed an exact replication of P&K’s math.

Jonathan and I have played a sort of doubles match with Mark and Shahid . . . 

Read More

Week of September 27, 2013

This week’s New and Noteworthy focuses on policy and evaluation – in understanding youth savings in the developing world, looking deeper at the potential of conditional cash transfers in the US, and outlining the road to full financial inclusion.

  • As part of its Financial Inclusion 2020 initiative, the Center for Financial Inclusion this week released its Five Roadmaps to Full Financial Inclusion, which offer recommendations and action points on topics including client protection, credit reporting, and addressing customer needs. CFI’s Managing Director, Elisabeth Rhyne, shared her thoughts on the project on the CGAP blog.
     

  • Much has been written about the pros and cons of bitcoins (and their legal and regulatory repercussions), but Gene Frieda shares his thoughts on the WEF blogon the role of bitcoins as an alternative currency and a speculative commodity.
     
  • Thailand has made progress in the area of financial inclusion (73% of the population has a bank account and only 3% have no access to formal finance whatsoever) but still has a problem when it comes to prevalence of loan sharks. The Economist highlights some interesting tactics that the government is undertaking to try to curb their activity.
     
  • The concept of conditional cash transfers is nothing new and programs like Bolsa Familia in Brazil have shown some success. In the United States, New York City has pioneered the policy strategy domestically. Recent evaluation results of a program administered by MDRC show potential educational benefits, specifically for high school students.
     
  • Many microfinance programs focus on access to financial services for adult populations. But if given the opportunity, would youth in developing countries save via formal services? This is one of the questions addressed by the YouthSave Initiative, which recently released a report of findings from its program targeting 12-18 year olds in Colombia, Ghana, Nepal and Kenya.

Who Will Pay for Financial Inclusion?

A dinner I attended on Monday night previewed the upcoming Financial Inclusion 2020 Global Summit in London. The Summit’s ultimate goal is to include 2.5 billion more people in the formal financial system by 2020.  It was an interesting (off the record) conversation. Without violationg the rules of engagement, I want to focus in on a topic I raised: Who is going to pay for financial inclusion? 

Providing financial services to poor households has been and will continue to be expensive. While technology (like electronic payments) and innovative approaches (like KGFS) can reduce costs, they cannot make serving poor customers cost- or profit-competitive with serving wealthier customers.  The bottom line is that including 2.5 billion people in the financial system is going to cost money. Someone will have to pay.

Read More

Week of September 23, 2013

After a short break, New and Noteworthy returns with a discussion on financial literacy, the true cost of cash, and the status of payment systems around the world.
 

  • new report from the Gates Foundation compares payment systems in more than 30 countries incorporating insights from more than 100 interviews with regulators and payments providers from around the world, including banks and telecommunications companies. It includes in-depth investigations in six countries – China, India, Kenya, Nigeria, the Netherlands and the United States.
     
  • A blog post from the Harvard Business Review reports on the current status of the world’s women entrepreneurs, who now represent owners of 37% of SMEs globally.
     
  • A US-based company called RoboCoin announced it will launch kiosks throughout Canada that allow customers to convert Bitcoins into cash.
     
  • The New America Foundation released a report arguing that America has moved from a High Wages-Low Prices-Welfare system to a Low Wages-Low Prices-Tax Break system. The report highlights the drawbacks of this new system and offers some alternative structures.
     
  • The New Yorker reviews a recent study by The Fletcher School at Tufts that shows low-income Americans spend an average of more than three times as much as their high-income counterparts to access cash.
     
  • Can soap operas be a force for social change? According to The World Bank, there is evidence to suggest they can. A study in South Africa shows viewers of a popular television show Scandal! improved their financial literacy and behavior after watching episodes that incorporated financial education messages. On a related note, The World Bank blog explores the difference between financial literacy and financial capacity.
     
  • This past week, the US Census Bureau released its annual report on poverty rates in the US. While the figures provide a snapshot of the economic situation in America, NPR reminds its listeners that the poverty rate does not include income from benefit programs such as food stamps and also does not take into consideration differences in cost of living for various localities.
     
  • A new mobile payment service focused on Latin America called Regalii allows individuals to transfer funds by purchasing “mobile gift cards” at specific retailers—so that remittance senders can control where funds are spent. 

Week of September 9, 2013

In this week’s New and Noteworthy, mobile money is inspiring innovations in Kenya and new research points to the link between poverty and how the brain works.

  • Last week Anandi Mani et al. released a study showing a link between poverty and decision-making ability based on changes in cognitive functions of Indian sugarcne farmers over a growing cycle. Two of the lead authors (Sendhil Mullainathan and Eldar Shafir) also released a book, Scarcity, which further explores the impact of poverty on mind-set and psychology.
  • In The World Bank’s Development Impact Blog, David McKenzie recently explored the role of clinical equipoise in RCT development trials, that is – whether researchers have the obligation to prove the uncertainty of the expected impact of an intervention and to what degree.
  • Recently a company called Kipochi launched an e-wallet service in Kenya, allowing international transfers via Bitcoins. The move has the potential to integrate M-Pesa with international services but some have concerns regarding security and regulatory issues.
  • In a different part of Kenya, innovations in mobile money are expanding energy access in slums. The start-up access:energy uses wind turbines and solar panels to create “microgrids” in informal settlements, starting with one on Remba, an island in Lake Victoria. Users can pay for energy use using their mobile phones.
  • Should we be looking to the pump when thinking about loan pricing? Recent blog posts from CFI and Microfinance Transparency use a gasoline analogy in discussing different (but related) issues. CFI explores a new Chilean system of reducing terms and conditions of loans into a two-digit number while Azish Filabi of the FRBNY looks at the issue of pricing transparency and consumer protection in Africa’s mircrofinance industry.
  • In the wake of recent national debates around food stamps in the US, Al Jazeera published an in-depth profile of the complexities around the system, including for those who are fraudulent.
  • A new study from the Center for American Progress shows that children growing up in regions in the US with higher rates of an economic middle class are more likely to move out of poverty than in regions where income inequality is high.

Some Thoughts on Scarcity

Underlying, sometimes deeply underlying, much of the conversation about financial services for poor households is the question of how much control poor households have over their lives and how capable they are of making good choices. The Yunus theory of microcredit assumes that the poor have a great deal of control--the only thing they lack is credit. Once they have it, they can make smart, informed choices about how to use capital to improve their lives. The growing enthusiasm for cash-transfer-style programs is built on similar foundations. Paul Niehaus, one of the founders of GiveDirectly, a new charity that focuses on unconditional cash transfers for poor households in Kenya (if you don't know GiveDirectly, do listen to the This American Life story about them), often talks about a core motivation of the approach being the belief that poor households know better how to spend cash than outsiders do. . . . 

Read More

Week of September 2, 2013

In this edition of New and Noteworthy, we are highlighting the predictive power of economics, regulatory action around Bitcoin, and the intersection of privacy, technology and “mobile for development” programs.

  • Last week, the U.S. marked the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech. While much has been made in terms of civil rights progress, a new survey from Pew Research shows the widening gaps between blacks and whites in terms of financial and economic well-being.
     
  • Alex Rosenberg and Tyler Curtain wax philosophic in this New York Times opinion piece on the predictive power of economics and what that means for the next Federal Reserve Chairman.
     
  • In much of the developing world, the adage of keeping money under the mattress is quite literal – often cash is kept in safe boxes or other hiding spots in the home.  A new IMTFI blog post addresses why the poor continue to keep money at home even if bank accounts are accessible.
  • A recent report from the New America Foundation discusses principles of privacy and security in a time when mobile technology is gaining immense popularity in international development projects.
     
  • Forbes reports that in the wake of a recent ruling by a federal judge declaring Bitcoin as real currency, the New York State Department of Financial Services subpoenaed 22 digital-currency companies and investors asking for information regarding a host of topics including money laundering controls and consumer protection practices.
     
  • The future of banking may look like “a cross between an Apple Store, a Starbucks and a W Hotel lobby,” according to this article on the expansion of Umpqua Bank’s “bank-as-community” retail model.

Week of August 26, 2013

On a special Monday edition of New and Noteworthy, we find some new insights into debates we’ve covered at FAI in the past – the ethics of RCTs, the pros and cons of social impact bonds, the hype of cash transfer programs, and using behavioral economics to inform policy.

  • In response to a recent feature on This American Life focused on the work of Heifer International and GiveDirectly, Chris Blattman wrote a blog post both advocating for cash transfer but also exploring the ethics of RCTs.
     
  • Meanwhile Berk Ozler at the World Bank explores the data and research behind the hype of transfer programs.
     
  • Social Impact Bonds are gaining traction in the social investment sector but not without critics. Recently Adrian Brown wrote “cashable savings” undermines the bonds while Steve Goldberg counters that funders should just be more selective when using this tool.
  • Zeti Akhtar Aziz, Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia, recently wrote an opinion piece that makes the case for using proportionate regulation (regulation associated with various levels of risk) to advance financial inclusion and foster innovation in developing countries.
     
  • Microfinance products like savings accounts and loans have many applications, not just funding small businesses. For example, a new smart card helps women with maternal health and family insurance, The New York Times explores applications in providing access to water and sanitation, and farmers may seek to benefit from mobile money applications.

Week of August 16, 2013

This week’s new and noteworthy includes new perspectives on ongoing debates, including the US’ Social Security system, Social Impact Bonds, and the intersection of behavioral economics and policy.
 

  • In December 2010, the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh passed a law that severely restricted the operations of micro-inance institutions. New research from Renuka Sane and Susan Thomas measure the impact of microcredit withdrawal and find that average household expenditure dropped by 19 percent relative to a control group after the ban with some evidence of higher volitity in consumption.

  • In discussing financial services and microfinance, it is easy to get caught up in talk of numbers like interest and repayment rates. However, Alejandro Drexler reminds us that much of the day-to-day impact of MFIs is built on relationships, particularly between the loan officer and the borrower. His recent research focuses on the importance of interpersonal relationships in the lending process.
  • FAI affiliate and co-founder Sendhil Mullainathan explores the complexities and trade-offs in health care economics, including the impact of an economic concept called moral hazard, in this New York Times piece. To learn more about moral hazard, check out our new video on the topic. We also welcome your feedback on our #FAI101 series in the comments section or on Twitter - @financialaccess
  • Robert Townsend published a new paper addressing various meanings of “accounting for the poor,” including valuing their economic contributions to GDP. The working paper version is available here.
     
  • There has been a lot of buzz lately about Social Impact Bonds but MaRS Centre Fellow Jessica Leifer explores whether their popularity could increase a phenomenon called “cream skimming” (think reverse brain drain).
     
  • Recently MTFI fellows Ishita Ghosh and Kartikeya Bajpai released the second part in their blog series on the intersection of remittances, savings, and mobile money. Part one is located here.
     
  • Speaking of mobile money, a new smartphone app helps to control spending by tracking what you don’t buy. Earmark allows users to log all of the times they passed up that morning latte or cab ride home to see how much they are saving over time. The app also has a goal-setting feature to keep users motivated and allows them to pin big-ticket items they can buy using all those saved funds.
     
  • A new report from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research illustrates the share of income Social Security provides to different gender, age, race/ethnic, and marital groups, while also highlighting other sources of income for the US’ growing elderly population.
     
  • In the current version of the Stanford Social Innovation Review, Paul Brest and Kelly Born answer the question “When Can Impact Investing Create Real Impact?”

Week of August 9, 2013

This week’s "New and Noteworthy" includes several stories on the intersection of banking and technology. Emerging trends show more people relying on digital platforms for financial services, including sending money home.  While technology has the potential to reach the unbanked, CGAP reminds us not to forget social inclusion as we work toward this goal.

  • What's next for Grameen Bank? A government commission was said to be planning an announcement that it would take a controlling stake in the bank, diluting existing shareholders and perhaps breaking the bank up. Since that story emerged, the government of Bangladesh has denied it, but does seem to say that it will change the governance of the bank. How that is materially different than taking 51% ownership remains to be seen. 
  • NPR’s Marketplace reported on a new program being developed in Washington, D.C. is that will require individuals in homeless shelters to set aside part of any income into savings accounts.
  • David Bauer created a beautiful visualization of the evolution of worldwide remittances since 1970.
  • In an interview with GSMA, Professor Njuguna Ndung’u, Governor of the Central Bank of Kenya, discusses the impact and challenges to the growing mobile money sector in his homeland.
  • Less than 1% of participants in the Juntos transfer program in Peru knew what a bank statement, a voucher, or an interest rate was, points out Carolina Trivelli on the CGAP blog. Her post focuses on the symbiotic relationship between social inclusion and financial inclusion.
  • According to the Pew Research Center, 51% of US adults bank online and 32% bank using their mobile phones. Click here for the full report on the changes in US banking habits and technology.
  • A new paper provides insights into the post-midlife spending “hump” while CFI provides a deeper dive into life cycles and financial needs.
  • The talk of “Big Data” seems to be everywhere these days – including the UN. This profile on the Global Pulse department highlights the impact of data on development.
  • MoneyGram announced that PayPal customers can now withdraw or deposit money from their PayPal accounts at physical MoneyGram locations. With the link-up, users in the United States will have the ability to shop online, send gifts and receive physical cash without a bank account. 
  • Another new service for the unbanked in the news is Puddle, an app that allows users to extend small loans and informal “banking” services to those in their social network.
  • ProPublica released two new articles on payday lending in the U.S. in its Debt Inc. series.  One talks about regulation and the fight for lenders to stay legal while the other focuses on Washington’s attempt to restrict lenders.

New Paper on Impact of Savings Groups on Poor African Women

Self-funded groups are an increasingly common way of delivering microfinance services. In India, for example, self-help groups increased their membership dramatically in Andhra Pradesh after the microfinance crisis of 2009-2010. In Africa, several international NGOs are promoting village savings and loans associations (VSLAs) as member-driven, local institutions.

Can these groups “replace” traditional microfinance, in the sense that they do not need the intervention of loan officers or professional managers? An interesting paper contributes to answering this question . . . 

Read More

Week of August 5, 2013

Innovations in banking technology can have both positive and negative consequences for customers as shown by this week’s edition of New and Noteworthy. While a parallel currency system promotes business in a Kenyan slum and online tools help map financial inclusion, customer data on banking errors can increase the number of unbanked.

  • In the footsteps of M-Pesa, slum dwellers in Kenya are creating their own currency system called Bangla-Pesa. Bangla-Pesa is a system of vouchers with designated values. The vouchers are honored as a means of exchange for goods and services within the confines of the Bangladesh slum in Mobasa and help businesses remain operational even during downturns in their regular business volume.
     
  • Earlier this month, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation released an interactive tool to improve the way financial access is measured and tracked around the world. The CGAP team posted an analysis of some of the data from Nigeria, Uganda, and Tanzania to get a better picture of financial inclusion in those countries.
     
  • While banking errors like bouncing a check or overdrawing from an account might seem minor, they can actually blacklist low-income customers from formal financial institutions, according to The New York Times. Banks have been using customer databases for over 20 years to assess high-risk customers but consumer advocacy groups say this method disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and increases the number of unbanked Americans.
  • According to new research, there is evidence that early life financial stress can lead to health issues later in life, even in cases of upward economic mobility.
     
  • Recently the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System released a report on the prevalence of prepaid cards in government-administered payment programs and their subsequent fees. While 94 government offices and 186 programs issued $136 billion through prepaid cards, this sum accounted for just 13.4 percent of the total payment funds.
     
  • In an article for Forbes.com, Ann Harrison of the Wharton school asserts if firms in Africa had an “even playing field” (i.e. better infrastructure, governance, and access to capital), they would outperform their Western counterparts.
     
  • According to the US Census Bureau, 49 cities (with populations greater than 100,000) had significant declines in poverty rates when off-campus college students were excluded from the calculations.

Asset Transfers for (Pre-) Entrepreneurs: Evidence from Chile

The original theory of microcredit was that it offered the opportunity for poor households to create profitable microenterprises. But there were always households left behind—those that were too poor to create a microenterprise or plausibly repay even the very small loans on offer.

One attempt to address these households, usually called the “ultra poor,” was to create an asset transfer and training program that would allow them to “graduate” into standard microcredit. BRAC’s Targeting the Ultra Poor program is perhaps the best known of these. Evaluations of TUP-style programs have been mixed – with some showing no effect and others strong effects. It seems that a major factor is local labor markets—when ultra poor households have good wage labor alternatives, asset transfers do not help much. When local labor markets are thin or non-existent, asset transfers can make a big difference . . . 

Read More

From Responsible Finance to Suitable Finance: Financial Engineering for Low-Income Households

This post is written by Bindu Ananth and Amit Shah. Bindu Ananth is President of the IFMR Trust and Amit Shah is Head of  Business Intelligence at IFMR Rural Finance. They co-edited the recently published book “Financial Engineering for Low-Income Households.”

Five years ago when we set up the KGFS model of financial institutions in remote-rural India, we wanted to make a fundamental shift in the way financial services were offered to households. We wanted the organising principle to be suitability, i.e., how do we make sure that every single customer receives the portfolio of financial services that is most suitable given her needs and preferences? This is essentially what wealth managers are supposed to do for ultra-rich individuals but we wanted to do it for clients with a mean income of USD 1000 per year through staff with twelve years of formal education . . . 

Read More

Week of July 29, 2013

Recent political debates in the US include raising student loan interest rates, reforming immigration policies, and raising the minimum wage. This week’s New and Noteworthy highlights nuanced economic aspects of these issues and also looks abroad to a profile of programming reaching India’s ultra-poor as well an analysis of financing for women-owned SMEs.

  • In light of the recent debate on raising the federal minimum wage, The Pew Research Center released demographic data on who makes minimum wage in the US. The findings show minimum wage earners are disproportionately young, mostly white, and predominately part-time workers.  
     
  • A new report from Sallie Mae shows that parents are contributing less to college costs than in the past, but as NPR’s Marketplace points out, low-income families are actually having to pay more than their high-income peers.
     
  • USAID created a slick new infographic (based on this recent report ) showing gendered breakdowns of loan information for SMEs in the developing world.
     
  • Why was anesthesia an overnight success in the medical community but antiseptics took years to become commonplace? What can the trajectories of both innovations tell us about the spread of ideas, particularly in addressing development challenges? Atul Gawande answers both questions in his piece on innovation and information sharing for The New Yorker.
     
  • In what is being billed as “the most detailed portrait yet of income mobility in the United States,” a new study from researchers at The Equality of Opportunity Project shows that location matters when it comes to the likelihood of upward economic mobility.
     
  • Ignacio Mas and Kim Wilson question the labels of financial inclusion/exclusion and their implications in a post for the CFI Blog. They turn the debate on opening formal financial services around and ask the question of whether this is meeting the needs and desires of the poor.
     
  • Social enterprise and microfinance often aims to target the “poorest of the poor,” or those at the bottom of the pyramid earning less than $1.25 a day.  However, in an article for the Stanford Social Innovation Review, Bo Hopkins and Abi Olvera argue the pyramid is segmented, with the highest investment potential located in the $3 to $16 per day income level.
     
  • Banerjee et al. published results of a study on how information regarding microfinance travels through villages in India in the new edition of Science.
     
  • For those who are interested in the bottom of the pyramid, programs that target the “ultra-poor” have shown promising results. In the newest edition of the Financial Time’s Urban Ingenuity publication has a profile of one such program in India, administered by a partnership between Parinaam and Ujjivan.

Week of July 22, 2013

This week’s New and Noteworthy highlights trends in international remittances, the potential of social stock exchanges, and insights into the financial lives of Delhi’s rickshaw pullers.

  • In the wake of the House of Representatives’ passing a massive agricultural and food bill that did not include funding for supplemental nutritional assistance (commonly known as food stamps), Pew Research released a political and demographic snapshot of America’s food stamp recipients.
     
  • CGAP released two new studies:  One provides an overview of new trends in international remittances through mobile or branchless banking platforms and the other reviews financial data from hundreds of MFIs to look at interest rates and the costs and profits that drive them.
     
  • Can social stock exchanges make development financing democratic and accessible? That’s the question Devex explores in its overview of the impact investing sector and launch of London’s Social Stock Exchange at the recent G8 summit.
     
  • Telecom operator Orange announced recently that is it launching a new service called Orange Money International Transfer. The mobile money transfer function will allow users in three different countries (Cote d’Ivoire, Senegal, and Mali) to send money via their mobile phones to any other Orange customer in those countries.
  • During the most recent World Bank Policy Research Talks Series, David McKenzie challenges us to “rethink informality” in his presentation on SMEs in the informal sector.
     
  • Mani Nandhi, a researcher at the Institute for Money, Technology, and Financial Inclusion, has a fascinating blog series highlighting barriers to mobile money adoption among rickshaw pullers in Delhi. Parts one and two of the series offer personal insights and in-depth profiles of two such men, which include their own challenges and reflections on mobile banking.
     
  • In the Financial Times, Ramachandra Guha reviews Amartya Sen and Jean Drèze’s new bookIndia: Economic Development and Social Opportunity, on the Indian state’s role in increasing equality and providing social services.

A Terrific Reference—or Primer—on Microinsurance Take-up

Take-up of formal microinsurance products remain low around the world, typically ranging from 0 to 30-40 percent depending on the type of product and the conditions of the offer. A growing literature is testing various determinants of take-up, although little has been done to step back and consider what we have learned as a whole.

That’s a problem because the issues are complicated and multi-layered. There’s a high probability of being misled by any particular finding from the research when designing new products.

Michal Matul, Aparna Dalal, Ombeline De Bock and Wouter Gelade have done a huge service to the sector, then, in a new paper presented at the Third European Research Conference on Microfinance, held June 10-12 in Norway. Their paper is a must-read for anybody interested in microinsurance, particularly in understanding and overcoming the puzzle of low take-up for both first sales and renewals of purchases. The latter has been little considered, yet renewal rates tend to be even lower than first-sale rates . . . 

Read More

Informal Insurance, Basis Risk and the Demand for Microinsurance

The literature on microinsurance is growing. A series of studies have been published in recent years that look at determinants of (generally low) take-up of microinsurance products, particularly index insurance products. Some work is also being done looking at the impact of offering insurance to farmers.

At the Third European conference on microfinance, held June 10-12 in Norway, Mark Rosenzweig shared some interesting results on the take-up of rainfall microinsurance in India, and its impact on risk-taking. He particularly addresses two important determinants of take-up and impact that have so far received limited attention: basis risk (that is, the risk for a client that the insurance may not pay out when he or she experiences an actual loss due to the possible difference in rainfall at the weather station and on his or her plot), and the complementarity of formal microinsurance with informal insurance mechanisms . . . 

Read More