Viewing all posts with tag: Digital Finance  

Part 1 on The Role of Digital Money in Financial Inclusion

In this edition of the faiVLive, the Financial Access Initiative’s Tim Ogden and Jesse McWaters, the Global Head of Regulatory Advocacy at Mastercard, explored basic frameworks for understanding the differences between the rapidly growing types of digital currencies. They covered new and evolving digital means of exchange, how they interact, and what that means for pro-poor financial inclusion.

Read More

Building an Inclusive Financial System

In 2009, FAI founder Jonathan Morduch was part of a group that determined “half the world is unbanked.” Ten years later, the latest Global Findex tells us that the world’s unbanked population has been nearly cut in half. A combination of focused public and private efforts, aided by technology advances, yielded massive, though uneven, progress. It’s worth celebrating the gains, but also reflecting on what is still left to do. What lessons have we learned from the last 20 years that can close the rest of the inclusion gap? Why has inclusion in wealthier countries stalled? What does the inclusion agenda leave undone? How can technology be part of building more bridges to excluded communities?

This edition of the faiVLive was based on a new report from the Aspen Institute’s Financial Security Program, Building An Inclusive Financial System, that tackles those questions and more.

Read More

When is FinTech Pro-Poor?

In this edition of the faiVLive, with a group of expert panelists from around the world, we delve into the possibilities for FinTech to serve the poor and reduce inequality. Six years after McKinsey heralded “a new era of digital globalization,” what have we learned about when, and where, FinTech meaningfully advances inclusion, and when it creates a new (digital) divide? When does FinTech (in the words of Greg Chen of CGAP, during this edition of the faiVLive) build a bridge and when does it dig a moat?

Read More

Accounting for the Gender Profit Gap

In countries across the world, women earn less than men. This is true not only for wage-paying jobs, but also for the earnings of micro and small businesses, which play a prominent role in most economies. Women-led businesses are less profitable than their male counterparts, have fewer employees, and are less likely to grow. In this webinar, we discuss what we have learned form research and experience that can help policymakers, financial service providers, and other organizations better meet the needs of women, and close gender gaps in small firms.

Read More

Servicios Financieros Digitales y la inclusión financiera en América Latina

La pandemia ha elevado el perfil de los Servicios Financieros Digitales (SFD), los cuales han permitido una distribución sorprendentemente rápida de los fondos de apoyo social, ofreciendo un camino para brindar servicios financieros de forma segura y a escala. Sin embargo, aún quedan asuntos importantes que considerar en cuanto al despliegue e impacto final de los SFD. ¿Quiénes están siendo excluidos? ¿Cómo podemos asegurarnos de que los nuevos actores y modelos empresariales incorporen las necesidades de las comunidades y los clientes de escasos recursos? Esta edición de faiVLive reúne a profesionales e investigadores expertos para abordar estas preguntas y debatir el camino a seguir para los SFD y la inclusión financiera en América Latina.

Con la participación de: Xavier Faz, Líder de Modelos Empresariales y Líder Regional de CGAP en América Latina y el Caribe, Barbara Magnoni, Presidente de EA Consultants y Co-fundadora de MeXCo Soluciones, Timothy Ogden, Director General de la Iniciativa de Acceso Financiero de NYU, Kiki Del Valle, Vicepresidente Sénior de Alianzas Digitales de Mastercard.

Moderador: Gabriela Zapata, Consultora de Inclusión Financiera y Salud Financiera.

Week of June 26th, 2020 (faiVLive)

This week’s faiV was a faiVLive — a webinar featuring a panel of experts discussing the future of digital financial services and inclusion.

Thanks to everyone who joined our faiVLive webinar about the future of Digital Financial Services on June 26th. If you weren’t able to join us live, you can watch a recording of the webinar through this link.

About the webinar:

The pandemic has raised the profile of digital financial services, which have enabled amazingly rapid distribution of social support funds and may provide a path forward for delivering financial services safely and at scale. But there are important questions left to consider about the roll-out and ultimate impact of DFS. This edition of faiVLive brings together expert practitioners and researchers to address these questions, ranging from the impact of DFS on MFIs to digital security. 

Moderator:

Timothy Ogden, Managing Director of the NYU Financial Access Initiative

Featuring:

Support:

This faiVLive is supported by the Mastercard Impact fund, and in collaboration with the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth

Digital Financial Services, Inclusion, Exclusion and the Future of Pro-Poor FSPs

The pandemic has raised the profile of digital financial services, which have enabled amazingly rapid distribution of social support funds and may provide a path forward for delivering financial services safely and at scale. But there are important questions left to consider about the roll-out and ultimate impact of DFS. This edition of faiVLive brought together expert practitioners and researchers to address these questions, ranging from the impact of DFS on MFIs to digital security.

Read More

Week of May 11th, 2020

Editor's Note: I recently learned that my paper with Michael Clemens (that one I referred to last week that took 5 years from submission to publication) on rethinking migration from the perspective of household finance is among the top 10% of downloads at Development Policy Review so if you're eager to read something non-pandemic check it out. Apparently at least a few other people have done so. And the paper on what is happening with microcredit in Pakistan is now officially published.

–Tim Ogden

Read More

Week of April 27, 2020

Editor's Note: In the last faiV I noted that the question "How are you?" didn't seem like it could survive the pandemic. Here's an article from The Atlantic on some alternatives. But my favorite alternative so far is a different answer rather than question. Hans Dieter Seibel passed on that his colleague Marion Levy Jr. has a standard response to "How are you?" that seems especially apposite now: "Terrible. But I'm glad you asked."

Read More

Week of April 3, 2020

Editor's Note: The only two predictions I feel I confident in making right now are that a) we will find some new phrase for opening a conversation other than "How are you?" or at least some new way to answer the question, and b) that the trend of putting webcams on the bottom of a laptop screen is over. Thanks to all of you who reached out in reaction to the abbreviated version of the faiV last week focused on my concerns about the future of microfinance in the US and globally. Please keep sending information and thoughts my way.

Read More

Week of January 24, 2020

1. SMEs: So this is kind of old, at least in faiV terms. But it's new to me, and a good illustration of one of the fundamental ideas that underpins how I look at all research/interventions related to SMEs: Reality has a surprising amount of detail. The point the author is making is quite different from what I take from it, so let me explain a bit more. Figuring out how to run a small business, in most contexts where we care about helping people running small businesses--developing countries, marginalized groups or areas in developed countries, other people markets and regulation have failed--is really, really hard because there is a surprising amount of detail at every step in the process. Product, location, competition, marketing, production, accounting, financing, investment--all of them involve a surprising amount of detail, and lots of little ways to get things wrong. But with so much detail it's hard to figure out if something is going wrong, much less what specific thing is going wrong.
At this surprising level of detail we tend to throw programs that either only address one small detail (e.g. incentives for formalization), or lots of details spread out across many tasks (e.g. business training). In both cases we see small or negligible effects for the most part (in part because most impact evaluations of training don't have nearly enough power to detect the size of change we could reasonably expect).
That's a fairly long disquisition to set up that the next faiVLive will be on the topic of SME business training specifically. On February 20th, at 10am Eastern, David McKenzie and I will discuss what we know about SME performance, management, survival and especially training. Register to join us here.
Finally, while I remain one of the holdouts against the term "financial health" (more on that another day), here's a report from my old colleague Piotr Korynski, now at The Microfinance Centre, looking at the application of financial health to SMEs. It's definitely worth a read to start peeling back layers on the surprising level of detail required to really understand what is happening inside SMEs.

2. Cash: At this point I feel like any discussion of the death of cash should come with a mandatory voiceover of Mark Twain saying "Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated." Here's Olivier Usher from Nesta on 2020 being a tipping point in the "cash crash." There are some interesting data points here, and more importantly, some important questions about how payment mechanisms affect behavior, or allow others to control behavior.
The virtual voiceover to this particular death of cash pronouncement is from New York City, where the city council just yesterday approved a regulation requiring all businesses in the city to accept cash as payment. That means that 3 of the 15 largest cities in the US, as well as the entire state of New Jersey have banned the death of cash.
 
3. Financial Inclusion: Financial inclusion, like cash, has frequently been confined to the dustbin of history in recent years, in favor of other terms. As I mentioned I still prefer inclusion (while noting the irony of the name of the research center I manage) but the reasons that others don't are fair and reasonable. One of the main reasons "inclusion" replaced "access" was the recognition that opening lots of dormant accounts really shouldn't count for anything. But shifting terms didn't really blunt the criticism. Here's Bhavana Srivastava and co. from MSC on when financial inclusion is not inclusive for women, and how to change that. Here's IDEO.org on essentially the same topic, looking at what it will take to include women in the financial system in Tanzania, Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and India. And here's Mayada El-Zoghbi on why measures of access and inclusion don't square up with each other.
Bobbi Gray of the Grameen Foundation also has some problems with financial inclusion (sort of)--here's her list of financial inclusion "notions that must die." Of particular note is the third: financial inclusion is always positive. Keep that one in mind while you read this piece on "financial inclusion will see mass market adoption in 2020." If you're wondering what that means, I'm not sure you'll gain much insight from reading it--it's another in a long line of proclamations that "new data" is going to solve all the problems of financial inclusion. But their is one particular sentence that meant I had to link it: "one can only hope that common-sense regulations will enable these technological advances to deliver on their promise of greater financial inclusion." There are so many ways to read that sentence! And most of them aren't encouraging, but are probably right.
To illuminate that somewhat obscure criticism, here's a piece on a highly effective, yet illegal, way to make lending fairer to women. There is no such thing as "common-sense" regulation. This stuff is really, really hard--this would be a good time to go back to the link to Mayada's piece above and read it if you haven't.

Read More

Week of January 10, 2020

1. Looking Ahead: I've been pretty haphazard in announcing some important new things at FAI that are going to affect the faiV, in part directly and in part because they drive how I spend my time and what I pay attention to. First, we've received a three year grant from the Mastercard Impact Fund in collaboration with the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth to focus on Household Financial Security and on Small and Medium Enterprises. We'll be doing some original research internationally and in the US that I'm pretty excited about. But I'm most excited about two aspects of the new grant: 1) It allows us to think about issues globally without silos about developing countries or developed countries, US or non-US (and if you read the faiV regularly you know taking that perspective is one of my soapboxes, see Great Convergence below), and 2) an explicit part of our goals is to better connect research, policy and practice through what we're calling "learning communities" (and being at the nexus of research, policy and practice has always been our goal for FAI, and I where I think our greatest value lies). If you're focused on one of those topics and would like to be part of a learning community, please do reach out.
At FAI, we've also recently received support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to follow-up on and replicate research on facilitating urban-to-rural digital remittances in South Asia. The original study, in Bangladesh, found that encouraging migrants from rural villages to Dhaka to use mobile money for remittances to their home village had substantial positive impacts on consumption and savings for both senders and receivers. We'll be following up with the subjects of the original study and trying to determine to what extent similar gains are possible in other locations. It hits squarely on some important but neglected questions on migration as a household financial security strategy.
The Gates Foundation is also supporting the faiV directly, specifically to help us increase coverage from developing country researchers and other under-represented minorities, and to expand readership outside of the US/UK. In that regard, I'd definitely like your help in 2020. Would you recommend the faiV to colleagues in other countries? And when you see research from those outside the existing development economics industrial complex that deserves more attention, please do send it my way.

2. Looking Back/In Memoriam: We start the 2020s without one of the most important and influential individuals in the modern fight against extreme poverty: Sir Fasle Abed, founder of BRAC. When I do think about it, I'm flummoxed that Sir Abed was not much, much more famous than he is. He seems to fit in a category with, say, Norman Borlaug--people who profoundly changed the lives of countless people living in extreme poverty but who is nearly anonymous. Although perhaps the better analogs for Sir Abed are Sakichi and Kiichiro Toyoda, the father and son who founded Toyota and laid the groundwork for what is now known as lean manufacturing. Unlike Borlaug whose work is easier to tie directly to millions of people avoiding starvation, the Toyodas created an institution that fundamentally changed an industry (and perceptions of an entire country), and is for all intents and purposes universally respected as a key leader and innovator in its field.
BRAC is not only arguably the largest NGO in the world, but it's deep commitment to research and innovation is as unique and path-breaking as Toyota's has been to eliminating waste and improving quality. BRAC is probably most known for pioneering and documenting Oral Rehydration Therapy, and for inventing the "graduation"/Targeting the Ultra-Poor program, and for being one of the largest microfinance institutions in the world. But there are innumerable other rigorous research collaborations. Here are just a few papers from the last year based on collaborations with BRAC: 1) a women's empowerment program in Uganda, and a similar program in Sierra Leone, 2) a community health promoter program, 3) delivering microcredit to women in a mobile money account that they individually own, and 4) agricultural extension and malaria reduction. Honestly, is there any organization in the world that can compete with a publication record like that? Are there any other NGOs that have started their own universities?
But the thing that is most impressive to me about Sir Abed is that there is little doubt that BRAC will continue as it has without him. That is the ultimate mark of long-term impact. If you'd like to part of that, BRAC is hiring researchers.

Read More