A growing body of research on the economic lives of the poor in developing countries emphasizes that the already difficult task of making do on a few dollars a day is made harder still by the unpredictability and variability of poor peoples’ incomes. Thus, it comes as no surprise that emergencies can derail families and prevent them from getting ahead. The Financial Access Initiative, ideas42 and the International Finance Corporationrecently released a product case study on this problem, which focuses on the design, implementation, and results of a pilot emergency (“hand”) loan product in India. The product achieved its original intent, but the pilot encountered considerable institutional and execution challenges. The experience generated lessons for future product innovation. It’s a fascinating case study that underscores the value of behavioral economics in helping us shape programs and products. Read the new paper: Emergency (Hand) Loan (March 2011).
Blog
SEARCH BLOG
STAFF PICKS
Ten years ago, FAI managing director Tim Ogden published Experimental Conversations, a collection of interviews with economists and other people who critique, promote, and use randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in development economics. One of the interviewees was Michael Kremer, a pioneer of the movement, now a Nobel laureate, and recently appointed Chief Economist of the World Bank.
Editor's Note:
If you were hoping that the faiV would be a pleasant distraction from the overwhelming flow of AI-related content, sorry. For the record, the faiV had “ai” built in before Anthropic existed. And a housekeeping note: we’ve finally jumped ship from Mailchimp to NYU’s mailing platform—I guess if you’re reading this it’s been a seamless transition and if you’re not, well, you’re not. Feedback on the faiV’s content and format and delivery methods is always welcome, just drop me an email.
- Tim Ogden
NYU Wagner Graduate School
105 E 17th Street
New York, NY 10003
© 2026 Financial Access Initiative
NYU Accessibility Guidelines

Editor’s Note: I’m going to assume that you are seeing plenty of AI content (news and papers, not AI slop, though I’m sure you’re getting plenty of that too) from other sources, so I’m trying to think hard about the marginal value that the faiV can provide. As far as I’ve gotten so far: a) make sure that directly AI-related content does not take up more than 2 of the 5 items, and b) try to focus specifically on the cybersecurity issue for financial inclusion. Beyond that, I’m open to feedback on the value you get from the faiV in relation to AI to help guide us in the future. On a different note, I’ll be making a brief cameo appearance at the e-MFP Inclusive Finance Conference to moderate the opening plenary. If you haven’t registered, do so and I hope to see you there! - Tim Ogden