The microfinance situation in South India has put the industry into crisis management mode. David Roodman offers today's update.
Last week, I spoke to one of the most respected analysts of microfinance in India, and he argued that the sector was now "too big to fail". Roodman cites Daniel Rozas who warns that we ought to at least think about what failure might look like.
All of this has brought up the specter of the US subprime meltdown. Misaligned incentives? Too big to fail? Too much money looking for a quick return? Barbara Kiviat and I weigh in:
"Is microfinance the new subprime? We've been hearing that portentous analogy for years, and now that the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh is riveting the world with stories of loan-shark-style microfinanciers driving borrowers to suicide, the claim has taken on fresh currency. Considering the industry's growing commercialization, it is an obvious comparison to draw. But the most obvious metaphors are not always the most appropriate ones, and sloppy metaphors can easily drive bad policy...while it may be useful to draw some comparisons to the U.S subprime debacle, India's experience is drastically different in significant ways."
See the full piece at the Harvard Business Review blog.
Editor's Note:
If you were hoping that the faiV would be a pleasant distraction from the overwhelming flow of AI-related content, sorry. For the record, the faiV had “ai” built in before Anthropic existed. And a housekeeping note: we’ve finally jumped ship from Mailchimp to NYU’s mailing platform—I guess if you’re reading this it’s been a seamless transition and if you’re not, well, you’re not. Feedback on the faiV’s content and format and delivery methods is always welcome, just drop me an email.
- Tim Ogden